Archaeology of Memory – a brief overview of main issues

The Boyne Valley -Trim Castle

Archaeology, considered as an academic discipline, is engaged in the study of human activity in the past, through the analysis of artifacts, ecofacts, architecture, landscape, and any other evidences of human activity in the world over the centuries. Nowadays some researchers depart from the above mentioned definition of archaeology and emphasise the study of material culture (i.a. biography of things), regardless of the time of their creation.

By the glossary of psychological terms, Memory is the ability to encode, store and retrieve information, associations, emotions, sensory sensations, based on the mental processes of learning, retention, recall, and recognition and maintained over periods of time. We know that there is a memory in humans, to some extent in some animals and in a form of data storage in computers. This is all what is scientifically defined, for now.

Why despite the large weight of the human brain (approximately 1400 grams) and its great computational power, estimated by the German psychiatrist and psychologist Manfred Spitzer approx. 750 million bits per second (Spitzer 2007), we do not store in brain all kinds of information, memories, emotions, sensations? We transfer them to paper, we record, grab and save moments, situations, sensations, emotions, views, figures, objects, sounds, music, in various forms on various memory mediums. We do this constantly, reflexively and instinctively, deliberately and aimlessly, creating millions subsequent artifacts every day.

Perhaps artifacts, ecofacts, architecture and landscapes are our reaction to being in the world and its habitation? According to Marzena Żylińska, a Polish researcher dealing with neuropedagogy, our way of thinking, understanding phenomena and processing of information depend on how the life story carves our brain. The structure of the neural network may have a big impact on the way we perceive the world and react to it (Żylińska 2013).

In addition to the brain, the human body itself is a memory medium. On the body, as in the diary or chronicle, a history of a person’s life experiences, his/her subsequent social roles, initiations and rituals, another phases of life and illness can be saved, until the death and the stage of fossilization.

And what about the other non-human beings? Biological and physical properties of the trees (see Maximilian Frąckowiak, Kornelia Kajda, Dawid Kobiałka 2014) and rocks (see Andrzej Rozwadowski 2009), such as their longevity, durability, resistance to various external factors, texture, shape, plasticity, availability and place in the landscape, have been noticed and were creatively used by man. Nowadays also these forms of human activity can be treated as memory mediums, hence the new directions of studies on Memory of Things, Memory of Landscape and the like.

It is hard to imagine that one day humanity was able to cope so well without most of the modern items. A piece of rock, leather, wood or bone, and a few other natural ingredients, was enough to give vent to the emotions and create a beautiful cave paintings or a simple instrument. Perhaps in the darkness of the damp cave or in spontaneous dance in the light of the fire, people truly experienced their fragile existence on this unique and beautiful planet, if only for a while…

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Archaeology of Memory – a brief overview of main issues

  1. Marzena Żylińska is at least one familiar dissonance at this pretentiously English-language site 😉
    Warm-hearted regards
    . – Grzegorz Móżdżyński

    Like

    1. Congratulations, Grzegorz, to be the first commentator 🙂 Although I am not English native speaker I decided to build this site in English and maintain it in English, to gather a larger, diversified audience and to find people willing to cooperate in English and publish in English, still one of the most widely spoken languages in the world… “Pretentiously” – what exactly do you mean? Pretentious site or pretentious English language,or both? Thank you in advance for enlightenment.
      Best regards,
      AoM

      Like

      1. By using the emoticon 😉 I meant that the word “pretentiously” and the whole sentence should not be treated too seriously.
        I’ve just tried to express unexpected contrast between
        pretentious – claiming to gather diversified audience, and
        familiar – well known to me, a man having brain carved by “ż” and”rz”;
        “ż” and “rz” – typically Polish combinations of tongue twisters with teeth tighteners.
        Ciao!
        – GM

        Like

  2. I see now 😉 You’re right, maybe the juxtaposition of well-known and unknown, well-educated and self-educated, global and local is breakneck. Still, I belive it’s possible, moreover, it’s needed and profitable for both sides.
    By the way, Grzegorz, maybe you would like to share your opinion about Memory discourse in architecture or cultural heritage conservation/preservation? I will be glad to publish it on the blog – please think about it. I hope for a positive feedback 🙂
    Bye!
    AoM

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s